home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From wang!elf.wang.com!ucsd.edu!info-hams-relay Sat Mar 9 18:09:54 1991 remote from tosspot
- Received: by tosspot (1.63/waf)
- via UUCP; Sat, 09 Mar 91 17:43:17 EST
- for lee
- Received: from somewhere by elf.wang.com id aa23481; Sat, 9 Mar 91 18:09:52 GMT
- Received: from ucsd.edu by uunet.uu.net with SMTP
- (5.61/UUNET-primary-gateway) id AA22947; Sat, 9 Mar 91 10:50:21 -0500
- Received: by ucsd.edu; id AA13132
- sendmail 5.64/UCSD-2.1-sun
- Sat, 9 Mar 91 04:30:18 -0800 for nixbur!schroeder.pad
- Received: by ucsd.edu; id AA13124
- sendmail 5.64/UCSD-2.1-sun
- Sat, 9 Mar 91 04:30:14 -0800 for /usr/lib/sendmail -oc -odb -oQ/var/spool/lqueue -oi -finfo-hams-relay info-hams-list
- Message-Id: <9103091230.AA13124@ucsd.edu>
- Date: Sat, 9 Mar 91 04:30:12 PST
- From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <info-hams-relay@ucsd.edu>
- Reply-To: Info-Hams@ucsd.edu
- Subject: Info-Hams Digest V91 #203
- To: Info-Hams@ucsd.edu
-
-
- Info-Hams Digest Sat, 9 Mar 91 Volume 91 : Issue 203
-
- Today's Topics:
- Amiga Morse Code Tutor
- ARRL SSB Contest from W3LPL Multi-Multi
- Info-Hams Digest V91 #199
- Mailing lables
- MAJOR SOLAR FLARE ALERT - 07 MARCH
- Re: Data Packet Radio Might be Censored After FCC Citation
-
- Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu>
- Send subscription requests to: <Info-Hams-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
- Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
-
- Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
- (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".
-
- We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
- herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
- policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: 9 Mar 91 00:36:54 GMT
- From: hpl-opus!hpspdra!paulz@hplabs.hpl.hp.com (Paul Zander)
- Subject: Amiga Morse Code Tutor
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- Try the "Fish" disks of Public Domain software. Somewhere around #200
- or 300 there is one which reads a text file and generates Morse code at
- a specified speed. Of course, you need some text files...
-
- Paul AA6PZ
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 8 Mar 91 15:19:01 GMT
- From: hpfcso!jayk@hplabs.hpl.hp.com (Jay Kesterson)
- Subject: ARRL SSB Contest from W3LPL Multi-Multi
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- <Total Score: 11.8M, beating our record from last year.
-
- Great score John!
-
- <80 235 80 W3LPL
- <40 430 90 N3GB, KC3EK
-
- I am just getting back on the air after about 5 years of inactivity. In the
- past I did several single 40s or operated 40 from K0RF in multi-multi. It
- seems to me that the 40 and 80 SSB QSO total for the east coast multi has
- gone way up (in contests were you can't work VEs). Is there more Europe
- to run now, working more JAs, or are you passing lots of non-mult QSOs
- down to the low bands?
-
- Hope I can get some kind of station together before all the spots go away!
-
- 73,
-
- Jay K0GU
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 06 Mar 91 11:57:44 EDT
- From: Larry Jack <LJACK@UMAB.UMD.EDU>
- Subject: Info-Hams Digest V91 #199
- To: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu>
-
- From: Larry Jack
-
- ....question concerning having a scanner in a car in Michigan....
- Conditional, General, Extra Class licenses....
-
-
- Most, if not all of us are acutely interested in the technical side of (ham)
- radio. But how many have paid attention to the historical aspects, the why-we-
- are-where-we-are part of this hobby(?)? Since so little of this history is
- recorded, it is the duty of us OF's to pass it along to the rising generations
- of new hams. It is not that I am that old, its just that I've had my license
- for +28 years so I have seen a few more things than many.
-
- Call this a Personal History of Ham Radio in the U.S.- Part One
- *The Licenses*
-
- Back in the very early 1950's (when I was very young, by the way) the FCC
- restructured the Amateur Servc. to the include the 3 common licenses we
- know today: The Novice, Technican and General. For history pre '50' consult a
- real OF. The old (then) Advanced class liceses of the pre 50's era were grand
- fathered, and at some point the Extra Class license was introduced. But
- neither of these licenses had any more priv. to them than the (then) new
- General class license. I can imagine the screams and the nashing of teeth that
- this 'cheaping' of the Service must have produced, but it was done and
- surpringly the world still revolved. Point to remember... The Extra Class
- license was nothing more than an ego boost, a Government sponsored way to
- show you knew more about ham radio than the run of the mill new General.
- And the Advance chaps were just Grandfathers. The Extra did have a nice cert-
- ificate appearance unlike the other computer cards of the other classes, tho...
- The Novice license was much the same them as today- miserable little
- slivers of HF spectrum for young kids to chirp out CW contacts to
- each other on 75W (input) crystal controlled transmitters. No VFO
- were allowed. The license was good for 1 year and not renewable. It
- was move up or move out. Surprisingly, by todays standards, they did have
- 2 meter allocations- 2 meter 'phone- from 145-147MHZ (or Mc's, as we called
- them then). For some it was glorious year of 2-meter 'phone, and
- like the all-too-brief life of a May fly, they expired, never to renew
- (translated as this as Upgrade) or be heard from again! Alas...
- They had a very distinct callsign, WN, KN or in some rare cases WV
- prefixes. When a novice upgraded, the N or V was dropped. Depending
- on the callsign area and the station licenses issued, they could end up
- with 1X3 (K#***) or the N (or V) would be replaced by an A, or B (WB#***).
- Everyone knew a Novice and those that chose to treat them as some lesser
- life form could readily identify them as inferiors. Time changes few things...
- To oper. HF a Tech could hold a Novice license. Many did-with 2 callsigns.
- The original Technican license was, as today, an license of consession.
- Neither fish nor fowl, it still remains the license everyone one tolerates,
- modifies, slings mud at and restricts. The original, like the Novice, was
- a "Mail-Order" license- ie, a voluteer examiner. Allegations of cheating
- just went with the license, and no Tech was ever thought totally clean. But
- there were really two types of Techs... the Tech and the Tech(C)...Or Tech
- Conditional. If you went all the way into the big city to take the General-
- you had to go to the FCC offices, and if you failed, could only return
- after waiting 30 days- and DID fail the Code, they often let you take
- the test at a reduced speed for the Technican. The written test was the same,
- both the General and Tech were identical. Paper and pencil test- hard little
- cusses too, no memorizing guide books for those Hams! Those that passed the
- FCC-given exam got a regular license, all the mail-order guys got a " (C) "
- beside their license. This meant you could, at any time, be called into an
- FCC office and retested- just in case it was true and you did cheat on the
- volunteer exam. A license of compromise, the original Techs had "...All
- frquencies, power etc. above 220 Mc." Just great! Think what 220 is
- like today..imagine this in 1955! It was later modified to include 6
- meters, and later 145-147 Mc. (Notice, the same as the Novices....
- historically these two have always been connected, even back then.
- Remember too, that the only real difference between Tech and General
- then was 8 WPM (5 v.s. 13) The license was renewable, every 5 years, and
- the call signs were the same as Generals. Back then, all callsigns
- were issued in sequence, no special classes like today, so an Extra
- could have a 2X3 call while a Tech could have a 1X3. You could
- tell how long someone was a ham by their callsign, and the 1X2's were
- the oldtimers.
-
- I mentioned a Conditional class of the Technican; there was a Conditional Class
- for the General- called just that- Conditional. Orginally this was for anyone
- living more than 75 miles from an FCC office (those pre-Interstate days
- travelling was harder, I guess) Later this was tightened up to 175 miles,
- which pretty well excluded anyone in the lower 48 States. Same as the
- General license, but subject to recall and retesting. When the VEC programs
- were begun this license was grandfathered to the regular General class
- (as were the Tech's- to a regular Tech's)
-
- In the mid 1960's the American Radio Relay League lobby'd the FCC to
- clean up ham radio. They proposed and got what was to become known
- as Incentive Licensing. Ask any of your ARRL officers just what a
- great deal this was...Incentive license with a vengence! It took
- away major privels. from all license classes, and "gave them back
- when you up graded." Now you know where the Advanced (remember, these grand-
- fathers) and the Extra's (those Super hams- all dressed up but no where to
- go) come in. And hence the present day license structure. The higher your
- qualifications, the better the frequencies you got. Keep in mind, though,
- that unlike grandfathering, this took away and made you re-earn. A BIG
- difference. Ham radio is just now recovering from the "Incentive Licensing"
- flop of the '60's. For many it was a gross insult, to have to be retested.
- Many hams dropped out, fewer new ones joined, thing stagnated for years.
- While commerical interests eyed the ham frequencies, the ranks were thinning.
- The status of ham radio would be much different today if there were 2.5 million
- hams instead of the 0.5. Many still think this is due to the ARRL Incentive
- Plan. Look in the 25 Years Ago Sections in QST, and you won't find much even
- mentioned about this dark period in American Hamdom.
- An aside to the ARRL- they did not recognize Techs and Novices as "Real" ham
- back into the good old days. Full membership was reserved for General Class
- and above. No Mail-Order Space Cadets need apply.
- I think this history has gone on long enough.
-
- This hasn't had much to do with operating mobile in Michigan, but I had
- fun recalling (and calming my blood pressure) those Halcyon days. Things
- are so much better today.
-
- Larry Jack KL7GLK / V77LJ
-
- Of course this history is seen thru may own eyes, and as an OF, you
- younger squirts will just have put up with its interpretation. I welcome
- anyone elses...
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 91 08:45:34 EST
- From: skitch@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL (M. Squicciarini)
- Subject: Mailing lables
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- Does anyone know of a program to print lables on a HP laser jet
- printer. I would like to print several different address at one
- time.
-
- 73 -- marty -- nr3z skitch@nadc.navy.mil
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1991 03:47:42 -0500
- From: oler@HG.ULeth.CA (CARY OLER)
- Subject: MAJOR SOLAR FLARE ALERT - 07 MARCH
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- -- MAJOR SOLAR FLARE ALERT --
-
- MARCH 08, 1991
-
- Flare Event Summary
- Potential Impact Forecast
-
-
- --------
-
-
- MAJOR ENERGETIC EVENT SUMMARY
-
- Region 6538 continues to be extremely active. It spawned three M-class
- flares on 08 March as well as one major flare. This region has exhibited
- tremendous spot growth over the past 24 hours. The region, now located at
- S25E47 (at 00 UT on 09 March), covers an area of 2,400 million square
- kilometers encompassing a total of 63 spots (and increasing). The region
- contains significant shear and high magnetic gradients configured as a type
- Beta-Gamma magnetic group. This region extends 27 angular degrees.
-
- The most noteworthy event of 08 March was the impressive class X1.7/2B
- major Tenflare which began at 20:25 UT, peaked at 20:30 UT and ended at 20:34
- UT. Although this flare was not of long duration, it produced a very
- significant 91,000 s.f.u. radio burst at 245 MHz and was also accompanied by a
- strong 2,700 s.f.u. Tenflare which lasted 14 minutes. This flare is suspected
- of having produced a SID/SWF for approximately 30 minutes, but this has not yet
- been confirmed. No sweeps were observed from this event. The location of this
- flare was S24E43.
-
-
- POTENTIAL TERRESTRIAL IMPACT FORECAST
-
- No significant terrestrial impacts are expected from todays major class
- X1.7/2B flare. However, Region 6538 is now within range to produce moderate
- geophysical impacts. By 10 March, major flaring will be capable of inflicting
- potentially high terrestrial impacts such as major geomagnetic and auroral
- storming (depending on the flare characteristics). The potential for proton
- activity and PCA activity will increase beginning on 11 March.
-
- Major flaring is expected to continue. Major M-class flares are likely.
- Isolated X-class flares may also be expected. Numerous minor M-class flares
- can also be expected. Flare sizes could reach an optical category 3B with
- accompanying major SID's/SWF's of long duration (exceeding 40 to 60 minutes).
-
- Geomagnetic storming may occur over the next 24 to 48 hours over the high
- latitudes in response to the major flaring which took place on 07 March.
- Storming could become sustained at minor storm levels with possible isolated
- bursts of major storming. Middle latitudes should remain mostly active,
- although there is a slight risk for some brief periods of minor geomagnetic
- storming over the middle and low latitudes.
-
- Polar and auroral radio paths will become more disturbed over the next 48
- hours if the higher latitudes do become affected by the flare events of 07
- March. Signals passing through the polar and/or auroral zones will likely
- suffer from moderate to strong fading and absorption.
-
- As a side note, another Stratospheric Warming Alert has been issued.
- Stratospheric warming has occurred over eastern Siberia. Stratospheric
- temperatures over that area have increased by more than 30 degrees over the
- past week.
-
- Watch for future major flare alerts and possible geomagnetic storm
- warnings for middle latitudes.
-
-
- ** End of Alert **
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 8 Mar 91 21:03:50 GMT
- From: hpda!hpcupt1!holly@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (Jim Hollenback)
- Subject: Re: Data Packet Radio Might be Censored After FCC Citation
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- The point that the FCC was using to bring the fines against the node
- operators is that the amateur service is not to be used for commercial
- applications. The message that was post was clearly a commercial message.
- It advertised a 900 number. This is a clear violation of 97.113(a).
- Secondly, the distribution was 'ALL', which in effect made it a broadcast.
- The message fell outside the limits of 97.3(a)(23) and therefore made
- a violatoion of 97.113(c). 97.113(c) states that the amateur service
- can not be used for broadcasting. So the message violated the no
- broadcasting rule and violated the no commercial message rule.
-
- The sticky part of the stick is that there is NO exemption in the rules
- for the operators of a store-and-forward station. By agreement in PR-85-105
- the FCC agreed that the screening of the messages at the entry point
- would prevent the retransmission of inappropiate messages. Also in this
- agreement was the necessary trail of accountability. The Commision was
- clearly concerned about the unsupervised transmissions of third party
- traffic in this Memorandum Opinion and Order.
-
- Granted that there were no doubt a number of previous messages that would
- fall into this catagory little was done because they did not come to the
- attention of the FCC. The FCC office that initiated the action was the
- Virginia Beach office, which is in the Norfork-Portsmouth metropolitian
- area. This is a MAJOR navy town on the east coast. The fact that the
- message was for a anti-war movement probably is what brought it to the
- attention of the FCC.
-
- In the case of a person using a telephone to perform illegal activities,
- the phone company is NOT responsible because their mission in life is
- to provide unlimited, public access to there network FOR PROFIT. In
- short, they provided the service required of them so they can not be
- held responsible.
-
- It seems to me that by PR-85-105 the operator of a store and forward
- station is REQUIRED to screen all incomming message to insure that the
- retransmission of inappropiate third party, messages from non-amateur
- stations, or commercial messages can not occur.
-
- I did not say I agree with it, BUT these are the rules by which we
- have to play the game. I have a feeling the incident is far from
- over ... film at 11.
-
- 73, Jim, WA6SDM
- holly@hpcupt1.cup.hp.com
- not occur.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of Info-Hams Digest
- ******************************
-